Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Orenda and a Definition of Religion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

J. N. B. Hewitt's Orenda and a Definition of Religion, published in American Anthropologist in 1902, is the paper that introduced the Haudenosaunee concept of orenda into English language comparative religion scholarship. Hewitt, who was of Tuscarora and European descent and worked for the Smithsonian's Bureau of American Ethnology, wrote from a genuinely informed position within Iroquoian language and culture, and the paper is the primary route by which orenda entered the wider study of religion. Its limit is the vocabulary of its own moment, the paper is itself an argument against applying the category religion to Iroquoian belief in the way scholars of that era used the word, a dated theoretical framing scholars now read critically. Cite it for its documented role introducing the concept and for Hewitt's own firsthand linguistic material, reading its theoretical argument as a period piece rather than current theory.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
J. N. B. Hewitt's Orenda and a Definition of Religion, published in American Anthropologist in 1902, is the founding paper on the concept by a Tuscarora-descended ethnologist working at the Smithsonian, the middle tier reflecting the paper's own era-bound theoretical framework, since discarded by the discipline it helped found, rather than any flaw in its documentary record.
Notes
The paper that introduced the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) concept of orenda to English-language scholarship. Hewitt was of Tuscarora and European descent and worked for the Bureau of American Ethnology; dated in its own vocabulary (it argues against the category "religion" as applied to Iroquoian belief) but the primary route by which orenda entered comparative religion.
Citation
Author
J. N. B. Hewitt
Publisher
American Anthropologist, n.s. vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33-46
Publication Year
1902
Source Type
Journal article
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Subtle Energies, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.

Holds

2

Subtle Energies

General References

1

Subtle Energies

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.