Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Patch Tarot: The Spirit Science Deck (Barnes and Noble product listing)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is Barnes and Noble's own product listing for Patch Tarot: The Spirit Science Deck, created by Jordan River and published jointly by Schiffer Publishing under its REDFeather imprint. As the retailer's own listing it is a correct source for the deck's basic publication details, its creator and its publisher, matched against the same edition sold directly through Schiffer's own site. Its limit is that a retail listing records those bibliographic facts only, not an independent critical assessment of the deck's stated integration of Qabalah, alchemy and the Spirit Science character world it draws its visual identity from, so a claim about that interpretive question needs a source engaging the deck's actual content directly.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
This is Barnes and Noble's own product listing for Patch Tarot: The Spirit Science Deck, a retailer catalogue record of a Schiffer Publishing / REDFeather title, hence the middle tier.
Notes
Barnes and Noble's own product listing for Patch Tarot: The Spirit Science Deck (Jordan River, Schiffer Publishing / REDFeather); records the deck's publication details, not an independent or scholarly source.
Citation
Author
Jordan River
Publisher
Schiffer Publishing / REDFeather
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/patch-tarot-jordan-river/1148088719
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Jordan, Countries

This source names Jordan directly: "The Spirit Science Deck, created by Jordan River and published jointly by Schiffer Publishing under its REDFeather imprint."

Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)

This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Tarot Decks, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.