Wikipedia's article on the Presbyterian Church of Korea, community-edited. Reliable for the church's formal organization as an independent body on 17 September 1907 with 33 missionaries and 38 Korean presbyters, its post-World War II reconstruction with the General Assembly re-established in 1947, and a 2019 figure of around four million attendees across 286 branches in South Korea. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presbyterian_Church_of_Korea
Source Typereference
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the 1907 formal organization date and the 2019 membership figure, both stated plainly in the article's own text. NotesUsed for the Presbyterian Church of Korea's 1907 founding as an independent body and its subsequent scale.
Connections
Associated With
Korea, Regions This source names Korea directly: "article on the Presbyterian Church of Korea, community-edited."
Source Presbyterian Church of Korea (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
This source names Korean directly: "1907 with 33 missionaries and 38 Korean presbyters, its post-World War II reconstruction with the General Assembly re-established in 1947, and a 2019 figure of around four million attendees across..."
Source Presbyterian Church of Korea (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)
This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Spread Events, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.