This is not a separate work: it is the Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Laboratory, one article inside the same continuously maintained online reference this atlas also records as a general source. It descends from that encyclopedia rather than standing beside it, so citing this entry alongside the general Psi Encyclopedia record, or alongside another of its articles, is one editorial voice, not corroboration. Its own record calls itself a peer-reviewed reference article, which this atlas notes as the encyclopedia's own internal review process rather than independent replication of PEAR's findings. Use it for what this specific entry states about PEAR's own history and research program; a claim needing independent assessment of PEAR's specific experimental results needs a source produced outside the Society.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
This is the Society for Psychical Research's own peer reviewed Psi Encyclopedia reference article documenting the now closed PEAR Laboratory's history and program, treated at the top tier as that primary institutional account. NotesThe Society for Psychical Research's Psi Encyclopedia entry on the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Laboratory; a peer-reviewed reference article, not independent scholarly analysis.
Citation
AuthorPsi Encyclopedia
PublisherSociety for Psychical Research
URLhttps://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/princeton-engineering-anomalies-research-pear/
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
This record's own Notes state plainly that it is the Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Laboratory; one article inside that same continuously maintained online reference, not a witness independent of it.
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)
This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Organizations, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected.
- Years, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.