Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Mohammad Hashim Kamali's textbook works through the actual disputes between the Sunni legal schools over analogical reasoning and the other secondary sources of law, naming the specific points of disagreement between the schools rather than presenting Islamic legal methodology as one settled system. That attention to documented inter-school dispute, checkable against the specific arguments each school makes, is the textbook's real evidentiary basis. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly disagreement with Kamali's presentation of a dispute. Use it for established facts about Islamic legal methodology and the schools' disputes over the sources of law; it is not a devotional guide to specific fiqh rulings, which needs a dedicated practitioner source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Mohammad Hashim Kamali's standard scholarly textbook working through the actual disputes between the Sunni legal schools over analogical reasoning and the other secondary sources of law, naming the specific points of disagreement rather than presenting one settled system.
Notes
Mohammad Hashim Kamali's standard scholarly textbook on Islamic legal theory (usul al-fiqh), covering the sources of law recognized across the Sunni schools and the disputes between them over analogical reasoning and other secondary sources. Use for established facts about Islamic legal methodology and inter-school disputes over the sources of law; an academic legal textbook, not a devotional or practitioner's guide to fiqh rulings themselves.
Citation
Author
Mohammad Hashim Kamali
Publisher
Islamic Texts Society
Publication Year
2003
URL
https://archive.org/details/principlesofisla0000kama
Source Type
Scholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Sunni, Denominations

This source names Sunni directly: "the actual disputes between the Sunni legal schools over analogical reasoning and the other secondary sources of law, naming the specific points of disagreement between the schools rather than..."

Source Principles of Islamic JurisprudenceMohammad Hashim Kamali
Claims Backed By This Source (244 claims)

This source backs 244 claims across the atlas. As facts: 136 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 37 holds, 12 connected, 1 critiqued Here, 1 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 48 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 82 claims: 54 well-attested, 12 connected, 16 general references.
  • Doctrines, 67 claims: 42 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 12 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 8 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 48 claims: 30 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 13 general references.
  • Schools of Religious Law, 18 claims: 11 holds, 1 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 5 general references.
  • Denominations, 16 claims: 12 holds, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Practices, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Well-attested

136

Practices

Rejected Here

1

Schools of Religious Law

Held Differently

1

Schools of Religious Law

General References

48

Cities

Practices

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.