Home›Sources›Principles of Islamic JurisprudenceSourcesPrinciples of Islamic JurisprudenceCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/principles-of-islamic-jurisprudence.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/principles-of-islamic-jurisprudenceCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-principles-of-islamic-jurisprudence, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/principles-of-islamic-jurisprudence}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXMohammad Hashim Kamali's textbook works through the actual disputes between the Sunni legal schools over analogical reasoning and the other secondary sources of law, naming the specific points of disagreement between the schools rather than presenting Islamic legal methodology as one settled system. That attention to documented inter-school dispute, checkable against the specific arguments each school makes, is the textbook's real evidentiary basis. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly disagreement with Kamali's presentation of a dispute. Use it for established facts about Islamic legal methodology and the schools' disputes over the sources of law; it is not a devotional guide to specific fiqh rulings, which needs a dedicated practitioner source.FactsCross-Tradition ConnectionsClaims Backed By This Source (244 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1Mohammad Hashim Kamali's standard scholarly textbook working through the actual disputes between the Sunni legal schools over analogical reasoning and the other secondary sources of law, naming the specific points of disagreement rather than presenting one settled system.NotesWell-attestedMohammad Hashim Kamali's standard scholarly textbook on Islamic legal theory (usul al-fiqh), covering the sources of law recognized across the Sunni schools and the disputes between them over analogical reasoning and other secondary sources. Use for established facts about Islamic legal methodology and inter-school disputes over the sources of law; an academic legal textbook, not a devotional or practitioner's guide to fiqh rulings themselves.CitationAuthorWell-attestedMohammad Hashim KamaliPublisherWell-attestedIslamic Texts SocietyPublication YearWell-attested2003URLWell-attestedhttps://archive.org/details/principlesofisla0000kamaSource TypeWell-attestedScholarly workCross-Tradition ConnectionsAssociated WithSunni, Denominations Well-attested This source names Sunni directly: "the actual disputes between the Sunni legal schools over analogical reasoning and the other secondary sources of law, naming the specific points of disagreement between the schools rather than..."Source Principles of Islamic JurisprudenceMohammad Hashim Kamalitier 1Claims Backed By This Source (244 claims)This source backs 244 claims across the atlas. As facts: 136 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 37 holds, 12 connected, 1 critiqued Here, 1 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 48 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicArticles, 82 claims: 54 well-attested, 12 connected, 16 general references.Doctrines, 67 claims: 42 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 12 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 8 general references.Beliefs & Restrictions, 48 claims: 30 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 13 general references.Schools of Religious Law, 18 claims: 11 holds, 1 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 5 general references.Denominations, 16 claims: 12 holds, 4 general references.Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.Practices, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.Well-attested136ArticlesA Finite Text, an Open WorldA Ground for Ruling the Texts Never NamedA Report Admitted, but Tested Against the Quran's PrinciplesAbu Hanifa and the Kufan TraditionAhmad ibn Hanbal's Preference for Transmitted Report Over AnalogyExtending a Ruling by Its CauseFive Ways an Act Can Stand Before the LawHow a Thing Becomes Forbidden, and the Other Meaning of the WordHow Medinan Practice Set Maliki Apart From the Other SchoolsIbn Hazm's Rejection of Reasoning by ResemblanceIbtal Al Istihsan, the Treatise Shafii Named Against ItOne of Five RulingsSetting a Rule Aside for a Better OneSorting New Questions into Old CategoriesThe Jurist Who Said a Text Could Be Set Aside for the Public GoodThe Operative Cause and Why the Schools Bound Analogy DifferentlyThe Practice of Medina as a Source of LawThe Road West, and the Books the School ReadsThe Third SourceTwo Kinds of Innovation, Classically DividedUmar's Famine and the Limits of the PrincipleWhat Counts as ConsensusBeliefs & RestrictionsA Solitary Report Is Weighed Against the Established Principles of the QuranA Transmitted Report Outweighs Reasoning by AnalogyAl-Masalih al-Mursala: Unstated Public Benefit Is a Ground for RulingIjma: The Consensus of the Scholars Is BindingIstihsan: A Jurist May Set Aside a Strict Analogy for a Better RulingJuristic Preference Is Not a Valid Source of LawQiyas: Analogical Reasoning Is a Source of LawScholarly Consensus Carries No Authority Over the BelieverThe Quran Alone Binds and Hadith Carries No Legal AuthorityThe Settled Practice of the People of Medina Is a Source of LawThe Sunna Recorded in Hadith Is a Binding Source of LawDoctrinesAl-Masalih al-Mursala (Unstated Benefit)Amal Ahl al-Madina (The Practice of the People of Medina)HaramIjma (Scholarly Consensus)Istihsan (Juristic Preference)Qiyas (Analogical Reasoning)The five rulingsPracticesTayammumSourcesPrinciples of Islamic JurisprudenceScholarly debate8Beliefs & RestrictionsAl-Masalih al-Mursala: Unstated Public Benefit Is a Ground for RulingIjma: The Consensus of the Scholars Is BindingIstihsan: A Jurist May Set Aside a Strict Analogy for a Better RulingQiyas: Analogical Reasoning Is a Source of LawDoctrinesAl-Masalih al-Mursala (Unstated Benefit)Ijma (Scholarly Consensus)Istihsan (Juristic Preference)Qiyas (Analogical Reasoning)Holds37Beliefs & RestrictionsAnalogical Reasoning Is Not a Source of LawDenominationsSalafismShia (Twelver)SunniWahhabismDoctrinesAl-Masalih al-Mursala (Unstated Benefit)Ijma (Scholarly Consensus)Istihsan (Juristic Preference)Qiyas (Analogical Reasoning)ShariaSchools of Religious LawHanafi SchoolHanbali SchoolIbadi SchoolMaliki SchoolShafii SchoolZaidi SchoolSourcesPrinciples of Islamic JurisprudenceConnected12ArticlesA Finite Text, an Open WorldA Ground for Ruling the Texts Never NamedA Report Admitted, but Tested Against the Quran's PrinciplesAhmad ibn Hanbal's Preference for Transmitted Report Over AnalogyExtending a Ruling by Its CauseHow Medinan Practice Set Maliki Apart From the Other SchoolsIbn Hazm's Rejection of Reasoning by ResemblanceSetting a Rule Aside for a Better OneThe Third SourceTwo Kinds of Innovation, Classically DividedUmar's Famine and the Limits of the PrincipleWhat Counts as ConsensusCritiqued Here1DoctrinesAl-Masalih al-Mursala (Unstated Benefit)Rejected Here1Schools of Religious LawJafari SchoolHeld Differently1Schools of Religious LawHanafi SchoolGeneral References48ArticlesA Finite Text, an Open WorldA Ground for Ruling the Texts Never NamedA Report Admitted, but Tested Against the Quran's PrinciplesAhmad ibn Hanbal's Preference for Transmitted Report Over AnalogyExtending a Ruling by Its CauseHow Medinan Practice Set Maliki Apart From the Other SchoolsIbn Hazm's Rejection of Reasoning by ResemblanceIbtal Al Istihsan, the Treatise Shafii Named Against ItSetting a Rule Aside for a Better OneThe Jurist Who Said a Text Could Be Set Aside for the Public GoodThe Operative Cause and Why the Schools Bound Analogy DifferentlyThe Third SourceThree Traditions, Three Different Reasons for the Same RefusalTwo Kinds of Innovation, Classically DividedUmar's Famine and the Limits of the PrincipleWhat Counts as ConsensusBeliefs & RestrictionsA Solitary Report Is Weighed Against the Established Principles of the QuranA Transmitted Report Outweighs Reasoning by AnalogyAl-Masalih al-Mursala: Unstated Public Benefit Is a Ground for RulingAnalogical Reasoning Is Not a Source of LawIjma: The Consensus of the Scholars Is BindingIstihsan: A Jurist May Set Aside a Strict Analogy for a Better RulingJuristic Preference Is Not a Valid Source of LawQiyas: Analogical Reasoning Is a Source of LawScholarly Consensus Carries No Authority Over the BelieverThe Quran Alone Binds and Hadith Carries No Legal AuthorityThe Settled Practice of the People of Medina Is a Source of LawThe Sources of Law Are Four and the List Is ClosedThe Sunna Recorded in Hadith Is a Binding Source of LawCitiesKairouanDenominationsSalafismShia (Twelver)SunniWahhabismDoctrinesAl-Masalih al-Mursala (Unstated Benefit)Amal Ahl al-Madina (The Practice of the People of Medina)HaramIjma (Scholarly Consensus)Istihsan (Juristic Preference)Qiyas (Analogical Reasoning)ShariaThe five rulingsPracticesTayammumSchools of Religious LawHanafi SchoolHanbali SchoolJafari SchoolMaliki SchoolShafii SchoolComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year