Home›Sources›Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Reparations Order, ICC-01/12-01/15SourcesProsecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Reparations Order, ICC-01/12-01/15Citation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Reparations Order, ICC-01/12-01/15." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/prosecutor-v-ahmad-al-faqi-al-mahdi-reparations-order-icc-01-12-01-15.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Reparations Order, ICC-01/12-01/15. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/prosecutor-v-ahmad-al-faqi-al-mahdi-reparations-order-icc-01-12-01-15Copy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-prosecutor-v-ahmad-al-faqi-al-mahdi-repa, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Reparations Order, ICC-01/12-01/15}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/prosecutor-v-ahmad-al-faqi-al-mahdi-reparations-order-icc-01-12-01-15}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXProsecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, the International Criminal Court's own 2017 reparations order, rules on reparations for the destruction of Timbuktu's shrines and monuments, following Al Mahdi's conviction for the war crime. Its strength is that it is the Court's own order, the primary legal record of its reparations ruling. Its limit is that it addresses the reparations claim before the Court rather than offering an independent historical account of the destroyed shrines themselves, which needs separate sources.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (9 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsCitationAuthorWell-attestedInternational Criminal Court, Trial Chamber VIIIPublisherWell-attestedInternational Criminal CourtPublication YearWell-attested2017URLWell-attestedhttps://www.icc-cpi.int/mali/al-mahdiSource TypeWell-attestedCase lawAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1Reliability tier 1: the Court's own order, the primary legal record of its reparations ruling.NotesWell-attestedThe International Criminal Court's own reparations order in Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi (ICC-01/12-01/15, 2017); the court's ruling on the reparations claim before it, not an independent historical account of the destroyed Timbuktu shrines.Claims Backed By This Source (9 claims)This source backs 9 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.Well-attested8SourcesProsecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Reparations Order, ICC-01/12-01/15General References1Sacred SitesThe Djinguereber Mosque and the Timbuktu ManuscriptsComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year