Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Wikipedia, "Puran Bhagat (1933 film)"

source

A citation to Wikipedia's own article on the 1933 film, read directly. Its strength is a consolidated, independently checkable record of the director, studio, full cast, plot and the Punjab Cinema Art Society's own contemporary praise, cross referenced against the film's own release history. Its limit is that it is a tertiary encyclopedia entry rather than a dedicated academic study of the film or of New Theatres' Punjabi devotional pictures specifically. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puran_Bhagat_(1933_film)
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Wikipedia's own article, cited for consolidated production history facts, director, studio, cast and contemporary press reception, that are independently checkable against the film's own release-era record; that checkable factual core places it above the tier three floor a bare Wikipedia citation otherwise carries here, though it remains a tertiary encyclopedia entry rather than a dedicated academic film study, hence the middle tier.
Connections

Associated With

Punjabis, Cultures

This source names Punjabis directly: "A citation to Wikipedia's own article on the 1933 film, read directly."

Source Wikipedia, "Puran Bhagat (1933 film)"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)

This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Screen Works, 14 claims: 7 well-attested, 6 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.