Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Rationalism vs. Empiricism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Peter Markie wrote this Rationalism vs. Empiricism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Its authority comes from the same editorial model that gives the Encyclopedia its standing generally, a named specialist author writing a signed, peer-reviewed entry that is then kept current through dated revisions, rather than a fixed-edition print reference that can grow stale or an anonymous crowd-edited page with no accountable author. Its limit is that as a survey entry on a very broad philosophical debate spanning centuries and many individual thinkers, it necessarily treats any one philosopher's specific position at a summary level, so a claim needing close engagement with one rationalist or empiricist's own argument is better served by a focused study of that philosopher.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Published as a signed specialist entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, maintained by Stanford's Metaphysics Research Lab under an editorial board; a named academic specialist's continually reviewed reference entry, but a survey encyclopedia entry rather than a full peer reviewed monograph, hence the middle tier.
Notes
Peter Markie's Rationalism vs. Empiricism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference, not a fixed-edition monograph.
Citation
Author
Peter Markie
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year
2004
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 28 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Philosophical Schools, 17 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.