Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Religion in China: Survival and Revival under Communist Rule

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Fenggang Yang is a sociologist of religion, and this academic book, published by Oxford University Press, examines the survival and resurgence of religious practice in China under Communist Party rule, using sociological method and fieldwork to analyze how religion persisted despite decades of state suppression. Its strength is Yang's development of a specific analytical framework, describing a red, black and gray religious market to explain officially sanctioned, banned and ambiguous religious activity respectively, grounded in his own sociological research. Its limit is that religious policy and practice in China have continued to shift since publication, particularly under more recent state policy, so time sensitive claims about current conditions should be checked against more recent reporting or research.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Fenggang Yang's sociological study of Chinese folk religion, Daoism and the state, the standard account of what survived and what returned under Communist rule.
Notes
Sociological study of Chinese folk religion, Daoism and the state; the standard account of what survived and what returned.
Citation
Author
Fenggang Yang
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2011
Source Type
Monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "resurgence of religious practice in China under Communist Party rule, using sociological method and fieldwork to analyze how religion persisted despite decades of state suppression."

Claims Backed By This Source (82 claims)

This source backs 82 claims across the atlas. As facts: 49 well-attested. As cited relationships: 18 holds, 1 connected. Plus 14 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 15 claims: 6 well-attested, 5 holds, 4 general references.
  • Religions, 14 claims: 8 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 14 claims: 9 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Open Questions, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Religious Offices, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Bodies of Water, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Organization & Structure, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.