Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Religious revival, nationalism and the invention of tradition: political Tengrism in Central Asia and Tatarstan

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Marlene Laruelle is a scholar of Central Asian politics and religion, and this is her peer reviewed article in the academic journal Central Asian Survey, examining the modern revival of Tengrism, the traditional sky god religion of the Turkic and Mongolic steppe, as it has been taken up in nationalist movements in Central Asia and Tatarstan. Its strength is a specific, argued thesis, that this modern Tengrist revival is substantially an invented tradition serving contemporary nationalist purposes rather than an unbroken continuation of pre modern steppe religion, laid out alongside adherents' own rejection of that reading. Its limit is that this is one scholar's interpretive framework applied to a live, contested and still developing movement, so a practitioner's own self understanding of the revival, which the article itself acknowledges differs from its argument, is a necessary counterpart rather than something this article settles.

Facts
Citation
Author
Marlene Laruelle
Publisher
Central Asian Survey
Publication Year
2007
URL
https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930701517433
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A peer reviewed journal article giving the invention of tradition reading of the modern Tengrist revival in Central Asia and Tatarstan, presented alongside adherents' own rejection of that reading.
Notes
The invention-of-tradition reading of the modern Tengrist revival, given alongside adherents' rejection of it.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "Laruelle is a scholar of Central Asian politics and religion, and this is her peer reviewed article in the academic journal Central Asian Survey, examining the modern revival of Tengrism, the..."

Claims Backed By This Source (51 claims)

This source backs 51 claims across the atlas. As facts: 37 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Religions, 13 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 10 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Deities, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.