Religious Studies at the University of Vienna: A History of the Department, published by the department itself in 2020, is an institutional self-account of its own founding and development. As a self-account it carries direct authority for its own timeline and structure. Its limit is that it is not an independent scholarly history of the discipline of religious studies more broadly, and a claim about the field itself, rather than this one department, should draw on outside scholarship.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Religious Studies at the University of Vienna: A History of the Department, published by the department itself in 2020, the middle tier reflecting an institutional self-account that carries direct authority for its own timeline and structure. Its limit is that it is not an independent scholarly history of the discipline of religious studies more broadly, and a claim about the field itself should draw on outside scholarship. NotesThe University of Vienna Department of the Study of Religions' own history of itself (2020); an institutional self-account, not independent scholarly history.
Citation
AuthorDepartment of the Study of Religions, University of Vienna
PublisherUniversity of Vienna
Publication Year2020
Source TypeInstitutional
Connections
Associated With
Vienna, Cities This source names Vienna directly: "Religious Studies at the University of Vienna: A History of the Department, published by the department itself in 2020, is an institutional self-account of its own founding and development."
Source Religious Studies at the University of Vienna: A History of the DepartmentDepartment of the Study of Religions, University of Vienna
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Secular Organizations, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.