William Crookes was a prominent Victorian chemist, and this 1874 book is his own published account of his investigations into physical mediums D. D. Home and Florence Cook, in which he reported observing phenomena he could not explain by ordinary means. Its value is documentary, it is a primary record of what a scientist of real standing claimed to observe and how he described his testing conditions, in his own words. Its limit is the reason for its tier two placement and has been disputed since the 1870s, critics then and since have questioned the rigor of Crookes's controls, and his personal relationship with Florence Cook in particular raised contemporary doubts about his objectivity, so a claim resting on Crookes's reported observations needs to be read alongside that long-standing critique.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Crookes's own primary account of his spiritualism investigations, published by J. Burns; his methodology and conclusions have been long disputed by later scientists, so it is placed at the middle tier as a primary text of contested reliability rather than settled evidence. NotesCrookes's own account of testing D. D. Home and Florence Cook; its rigor has been disputed since the 1870s.
Citation
AuthorWilliam Crookes
PublisherJ. Burns
Publication Year1874
URLhttps://archive.org/details/researchesinphen00croo
Source Typeprimary text (contested reliability)
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Florence directly: "Home and Florence Cook, in which he reported observing phenomena he could not explain by ordinary means."
Claims Backed By This Source (33 claims)
This source backs 33 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Psi Phenomena, 10 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 4 holds, 3 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Figures, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.