Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Richard Wilhelm (reference article)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wikipedia's article on Richard Wilhelm, the German sinologist and translator of the I Ching, is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication. Its value is Wikipedia's open editing and citation process, reliable for standard biographical facts such as dates, missionary career and translation history, and less reliable for any specialist or contested claim about his sinological interpretations. Use it for Wilhelm's basic biography; a claim about the substance or accuracy of his translations needs a dedicated sinological source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's article on Richard Wilhelm is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication, hence the lower tier, though reliable for standard biographical facts such as his missionary career and translation history.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on Richard Wilhelm. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Richard Wilhelm (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wilhelm_(sinologist)
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (26 claims)

This source backs 26 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 19 claims: 18 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

General References

1

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.