Simon Price's Rituals and Power is a scholarly study of the Roman imperial cult as practiced in the Greek cities of Asia Minor, published by Cambridge University Press and widely regarded as the field defining treatment of the topic. Price argues, against an older assumption that emperor worship was either cynical politics or naive credulity, that it functioned as a genuinely coherent religious system that made sense within existing Greek civic religious practice. Its authority rests on close use of epigraphic and archaeological evidence from the cities themselves and on its lasting influence over how classicists and religious studies scholars since have approached ruler cult generally. Its limit is regional focus, Asia Minor specifically, so a claim about the imperial cult's different character in Rome itself or in other provinces needs a source addressing that different region.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Simon Price's Rituals and Power, published by Cambridge University Press, is a field-defining scholarly study of the Roman imperial cult in Asia Minor by a classicist whose earlier work is itself a standard reference, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship. NotesScholarly study of the Roman imperial cult in Asia Minor, 1984.
Citation
AuthorSimon R. F. Price
PublisherCambridge University Press
1984 first edition. Publication Year1984
Source Typeacademic monograph
Connections
Associated With
This source names Asia directly: "as practiced in the Greek cities of Asia Minor, published by Cambridge University Press and widely regarded as the field defining treatment of the topic."
Source Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia MinorSimon R. F. Price
Rome, Cities This source names Rome directly: "imperial cult's different character in Rome itself or in other provinces needs a source addressing that different region."
Source Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia MinorSimon R. F. Price
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Practices, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.