S.A.S. v. France, the European Court of Human Rights' own 2014 Grand Chamber judgment, upheld France's ban on concealing the face in public, rejecting the public safety justification but accepting the government's minimum requirements of living together rationale. Its strength is that it is the Court's own judgment, the primary record of its reasoning and holding. Its limit is that it rules on the French law before it rather than offering an independent account of face veiling practice itself, and a UN human rights body reached the opposite conclusion on comparable facts, which a reader should also check.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Reliability tier 1: the Court's own judgment, the primary record of its reasoning and holding on the case before it. NotesUpheld the French ban on concealing the face in public. The Court rejected the public safety justification as insufficient and rested the decision on the minimum requirements of living together.
Citation
AuthorEuropean Court of Human Rights
PublisherEuropean Court of Human Rights
Publication Year2014
Source TypeCase law
Connections
Associated With
This source names France directly: "v. France, the European Court of Human Rights' own 2014 Grand Chamber judgment, upheld France's ban on concealing the face in public, rejecting the public safety justification but accepting the..."
Source S.A.S. v. France, Application no. 43835/11, Grand Chamber judgment of 1 July 2014European Court of Human Rights
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)
This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religious Dress & Vestments, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.
Well-attested
8Religious Dress & Vestments
General References
2Religious Dress & Vestments
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.