Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Sabina Magliocco, Witching Culture

Academic monograph, 2004

Sabina Magliocco's ethnographic and folkloric study of American Neo-Paganism, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2004, including a direct scholarly assessment of the claimed continuity between Grimassi's Stregheria and documented Italian folk magical practice.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A folklorist's peer-published ethnography of American Neo-Paganism, the standard scholarly assessment of the Stregheria revival's claimed continuity with historical Italian folk practice.
Notes
Cited here for Stregheria's scholarly standing.
Citation
Author
Sabina Magliocco
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Publication Year
2004
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

This source names Pennsylvania directly: "published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2004, including a direct scholarly assessment of the claimed continuity between Grimassi's Stregheria and documented Italian folk magical practice."

Source Sabina Magliocco, Witching CultureSabina Magliocco
Stregheria, Religions

This source names Stregheria directly: "claimed continuity between Grimassi's Stregheria and documented Italian folk magical practice."

Source Sabina Magliocco, Witching CultureSabina Magliocco
Sources
Sabina Magliocco, Witching Culture
Sabina Magliocco, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Religions, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.

Well-attested

14

Religions

General References

1

Religions

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.