Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Switch Atlas

Source

Folio from an Unidentified Text, the Angel Israfil, accession S1986.219 (Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art)

Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art, corroborated across two independently read secondary records, read 2026-08-18

The Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art catalog record for "Folio from an unidentified text; the Angel Israfil," a detached manuscript painting, Islamic, Iran or Turkey, circa 1580 to 1590, opaque watercolor, ink and gold on paper. Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, accession S1986.219.

Facts
Citation
Publisher
Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art, Arthur M. Sackler Gallery
URL
https://asia.si.edu/object/S1986.219/
Source Type
Museum
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own catalog record for the accessioned folio, corroborated by the museum's own data as published on Google Arts and Culture.
Connections

Associated With

Israfil, Figures

This source names Israfil directly: "from an unidentified text; the Angel Israfil," a detached manuscript painting, Islamic, Iran or Turkey, circa 1580 to 1590, opaque watercolor, ink and gold on paper."

Source Folio from an Unidentified Text, the Angel Israfil, accession S1986.219 (Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art)
Turkey, Countries

This source names Turkey directly: "manuscript painting, Islamic, Iran or Turkey, circa 1580 to 1590, opaque watercolor, ink and gold on paper."

Source Folio from an Unidentified Text, the Angel Israfil, accession S1986.219 (Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art)
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.