Wikipedia's community maintained article on Scott Cunningham, the influential Wiccan author of popular introductory books on solitary practice, carries no named author or peer review process behind any given version of the page, and is continuously subject to further editing. Its strength is that it is freely and immediately checkable for uncontroversial biographical and bibliographic facts. Its limit is that a claim about the specific content or reception of Cunningham's teachings should be checked against his own published books or independent scholarship on modern Paganism rather than resting on this page alone. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Reliability tier 3: a continuously edited community reference page with no named author, useful for uncontroversial biographical facts only. NotesWikipedia's article on Scott Cunningham. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Scott Cunningham (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Cunningham
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
This source names Modern Paganism directly: "books or independent scholarship on modern Paganism rather than resting on this page alone."
Source Scott Cunningham (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 4 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.