Pehr Granqvist and six coauthors published this peer-reviewed article in Neuroscience Letters in 2005, an independently confirmed double-blind Uppsala University replication of Michael Persinger's God helmet experiments, which had claimed that weak transcranial magnetic fields could induce a sensed presence or mystical experience. Its strength is genuine methodological rigor, the study found that participants' suggestibility, not whether the magnetic field was actually applied, predicted who reported these experiences, a result that generated substantial subsequent scientific discussion including a published response from Persinger's own team. Its limit is that this remains one contested study within an active scientific debate over the God helmet paradigm, so a claim about the phenomenon's cause should note the dispute rather than treat this single replication as the final word.
Facts
Citation
AuthorPehr Granqvist, Mats Fredrikson, Patrik Unge, Andrea Hagenfeldt, Sven Valind, Dan Larhammar and Marcus Larsson
PublisherNeuroscience Letters
Publication Year2005
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.057
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A peer reviewed double blind replication study finding that suggestibility, not the applied magnetic field, predicted the reported experiences in the Persinger "God helmet" paradigm. NotesDouble-blind Uppsala replication of the Persinger God helmet paradigm; suggestibility predicted the reported experiences, the applied field did not.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Uppsala directly: "independently confirmed double-blind Uppsala University replication of Michael Persinger's God helmet experiments, which had claimed that weak transcranial magnetic fields could induce a sensed..."
Source Sensed Presence and Mystical Experiences Are Predicted by Suggestibility, Not by the Application of Transcranial Weak Complex Magnetic FieldsPehr Granqvist, Mats Fredrikson, Patrik Unge, Andrea Hagenfeldt, Sven Valind, Dan Larhammar and Marcus Larsson
Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)
This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 23 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 4 connected, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 4 connected, 1 general references.
- Studies, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 1 critiqued Here, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Years, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.