Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Shall We Gather at the River and Robert Lowry (Wikipedia)

source

A combined citation covering the Wikipedia articles for Shall We Gather at the River and for its writer Robert Lowry, community edited encyclopedia entries covering the hymn's composition, publication and later arrangements and Lowry's Baptist ministry and hymnal editing career. Their strength is stable, well corroborated biographical and publication facts drawn from period hymnal and biographical sources. Their limit is that a claim about Lowry's own theological reasoning needs a source examining his sermons or private writing directly, not an encyclopedia entry. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shall_We_Gather_at_the_River
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
A continuously revised, community-edited encyclopedia article rather than an authored or peer reviewed work, matching this corpus's settled precedent for Wikipedia citations, useful for verifiable factual detail rather than as independent scholarly authority.
Connections

Associated With

Baptist, Denominations

This source names Baptist directly: "and later arrangements and Lowry's Baptist ministry and hymnal editing career."

Source Shall We Gather at the River and Robert Lowry (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (28 claims)

This source backs 28 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Musical Works, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.