Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Great Persecution: A Historical Re-Examination

Min Seok Shin, 2018

Min Seok Shin's systematic re-examination of the Great Persecution under Diocletian and his imperial colleagues and successors, from 284 to the 313 Edict of Milan, including a wider count of martyrs drawn from local Acts of dubious individual reliability, of whom only 850 are named.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1 1
A recent academic monograph in a peer-reviewed classical studies series; its much higher martyr count than Frend's reflects a wider evidentiary standard, counting local traditions Frend's narrower count excluded, and the gap between the two is itself part of what this atlas records rather than a defect to resolve.
Notes
A recent academic monograph in a peer-reviewed classical studies series; its much higher martyr count than Frend's reflects a wider evidentiary standard, counting local traditions Frend's narrower count excluded, and the gap between the two is itself part of what this atlas records rather than a defect to resolve. 1
Citation
Author
Min Seok Shin 1
Publisher
Brepols (Studia Antiqua Australiensia, vol. 8) 1
Publication Year
2018 1
Source Type
academic monograph 1
Connections

Associated With

This source names Diocletian directly: "of the Great Persecution under Diocletian and his imperial colleagues and successors, from 284 to the 313 Edict of Milan, including a wider count of martyrs drawn from local Acts of dubious..."

Source Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Edition
Milan, Cities

This source names Milan directly: "from 284 to the 313 Edict of Milan, including a wider count of martyrs drawn from local Acts of dubious individual reliability, of whom only 850 are named."

Source Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Edition
Sources
1. Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Edition
Claims Backed By This Source (2 claims)

This source backs 2 claims across the atlas. As facts: 1 scholarly debate. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Religious Events, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

General References

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.