Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Perun, Svarog and Others: Russian Neo-Paganism in Search of Itself (Cambridge Journal of Anthropology)

Victor A. Shnirelman, Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2000

A peer-reviewed journal article examining how post-Soviet Russian neo-pagan movements constructed their ideology and used contested source material, including the Book of Veles.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Victor Shnirelman's article in the Cambridge Journal of Anthropology is a peer reviewed study by a specialist in post-Soviet religious nationalism, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed journal scholarship.
Notes
A peer-reviewed article by Victor Shnirelman, a cultural anthropologist at the Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology in Moscow who has published extensively on Russian neo-paganism and its use of contested source material. Confirmed to exist and cross checked by search snippet describing its content and citation, Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, volume 21, issue 3, pages 18 to 36. No freely accessible copy was found, so no url is recorded here rather than guessed.
Citation
Author
Victor A. Shnirelman
Publisher
Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Publication Year
2000
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Connections

Associated With

Veles, Deities

This source names Veles directly: "source material, including the Book of Veles."

Source Perun, Svarog and Others: Russian Neo-Paganism in Search of Itself (Cambridge Journal of Anthropology)Victor A. Shnirelman
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 10 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.