Seicho-no-Ie do Brasil's own website overview of its social and philanthropic activities, describing its own social-action division and one campaign's stated reach. Its strength is direct institutional authority for what the organization says it does. Its limit is that it is a voluntary self-published account rather than an independent audit, so a claim needing independent verification of scale or outcomes would need an outside source.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Tier 2: the operating organization's own website, describing its own social-action division and one campaign's stated reach. A voluntary self-published account rather than an independent audit. NotesSeicho-no-Ie do Brasil's own website, read directly, describing its Cabinet of Social Assistance and Philanthropy as the organization's social action arm, coordinating a Pre-Christmas campaign, the winter coat campaign and the Casa de Repouso da Grande Harmonia rest home, and stating that the 2022 Pre-Christmas campaign benefited more than 320 charitable institutions across Brazil. Classed own-published-statistics: the operating organization's own dated report of its own campaign reach.
Citation
AuthorSeicho-no-Ie do Brasil
PublisherSeicho-no-Ie do Brasil
Publication Year2022
URLhttps://sni.org.br/seicho-no-ie/organizacional/social-e-filantropia/
Source Typeorganization primary source
Connections
Associated With
This source names Seicho-no-Ie directly: "Seicho-no-Ie do Brasil's own website overview of its social and philanthropic activities, describing its own social-action division and one campaign's stated reach."
Source Seicho-no-Ie do Brasil: Own Website, "Social e Filantropia" Cabinet Overview (sni.org.br)Seicho-no-Ie do Brasil
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Denominations, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.