E. B. Banning is an archaeologist, and this peer-reviewed article in Current Anthropology reassesses the widely repeated claim that Gobekli Tepe and comparable Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites were purely ritual temples built by hunter-gatherers with no ordinary domestic use. Its strength is that it is a peer-reviewed argument engaging directly with the excavated evidence, questioning an interpretation that had become received wisdom in popular accounts faster than the underlying archaeological case had been tested. Its limit is that it is one article proposing a reassessment within an active and still developing scholarly debate, not a final settled consensus, so a claim about Gobekli Tepe's purpose is best framed as contested rather than resolved by this source alone.
Facts
Citation
AuthorE. B. Banning
PublisherCurrent Anthropology 52(5)
Publication Year2011
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1086/661207
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published in Current Anthropology, a peer reviewed journal for the field, E. B. Banning's article on the temple identification question, peer reviewed university-level scholarship. NotesScholarly article reassessing the identification of Gobekli Tepe and comparable Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites as temples.
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)
This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Historical Periods, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Subcategories, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.