Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Soma and Amanita muscaria

Soma and Amanita muscaria, John Brough's 1971 article in the Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, is a peer-reviewed philological critique of the theory identifying the Vedic soma plant with the fly agaric mushroom. Its strength is that Brough was a leading Sanskritist examining the textual evidence directly in a peer-reviewed journal. Its limit is that soma's botanical identity remains genuinely unresolved in the field, so this article represents one scholar's critical case rather than a settled answer.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a peer reviewed philological article by a leading specialist examining the textual evidence directly, one scholar's critical case rather than a settled answer to a genuinely unresolved question.
Notes
Peer-reviewed scholarly critique of the identification of the Vedic soma plant with Amanita muscaria, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1971.
Citation
Author
John Brough
Publisher
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Publication Year
1971
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Connections

Associated With

Soma, Deities

This source names Soma directly: "Soma and Amanita muscaria, John Brough's 1971 article in the Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, is a peer-reviewed philological critique of the theory identifying the Vedic soma..."

Source Soma and Amanita muscariaJohn Brough
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Studies, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.