R. Gordon Wasson was an ethnomycologist, and this book is his own primary presentation of the hypothesis that Soma, the sacred plant of the ancient Rigveda, was in fact the fly agaric mushroom, a specific botanical identification he proposed and argued for himself rather than one that has been independently confirmed. As a primary statement of a theory its own author devised, the atlas holds it at the tier appropriate to that kind of source rather than to independent verification, since Wasson's fly agaric identification remains contested among Vedic scholars and no consensus botanical identification of Soma has been reached. Its value is as the clearest primary statement of an influential and still debated theory, in its originator's own words, documenting a real strand of Soma scholarship rather than establishing settled fact about the plant's identity.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
R. Gordon Wasson's book proposing Amanita muscaria as the soma of the Rig Veda. The identification remains unproven and is rejected by many Indologists and by rival hypotheses, so it is cited here for the argument itself, a real and influential position, never as settled fact. NotesThe book that proposed Amanita muscaria as the soma of the Rig Veda. Tier 3 because the identification remains unproven and is rejected by many Indologists and by rival hypotheses; cited here for the argument itself, which is a real and influential position, never as settled fact.
Citation
AuthorR. Gordon Wasson
PublisherHarcourt Brace Jovanovich
Publication Year1968
URLhttps://archive.org/details/somadivinemushro0000wass
Source TypeScholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Soma, Deities This source names Soma directly: "presentation of the hypothesis that Soma, the sacred plant of the ancient Rigveda, was in fact the fly agaric mushroom, a specific botanical identification he proposed and argued for himself rather..."
Claims Backed By This Source (54 claims)
This source backs 54 claims across the atlas. As facts: 32 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 7 holds, 6 connected. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 22 claims: 14 well-attested, 6 connected, 2 general references.
- Plants, 9 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Studies, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Scholarly debate
2Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Holds
7Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
General References
7Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.