Wikipedia's community maintained article on Starhawk, the Reclaiming tradition co-founder and author of The Spiral Dance, carries no named author or peer review process behind any given version of the page, and is continuously subject to further editing. Its strength is that it is freely and immediately checkable for uncontroversial biographical facts such as her published works and activism. Its limit is that a claim about her specific theological or political positions should be checked against her own writing or independent scholarship on the Reclaiming tradition rather than resting on this page alone. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Reliability tier 3: a continuously community-edited tertiary reference with no formal peer review process, suitable for citable, checkable factual claims but not treated as authoritative on genuinely contested points. NotesWikipedia's article on Starhawk. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Starhawk (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starhawk
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
This source names Reclaiming directly: "maintained article on Starhawk, the Reclaiming tradition co-founder and author of The Spiral Dance, carries no named author or peer review process behind any given version of the page, and is..."
Source Starhawk (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (28 claims)
This source backs 28 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 16 claims: 13 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Practices, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.