The Coalition of Hindus of North America's 2022 submission to a House of Commons of Canada committee on Bill C-229 argues for the term "Nazi Hakenkreuz" rather than "swastika" in proposed Canadian hate symbol legislation. Its strength is that it is a real, publicly filed primary document of an actual legislative debate, useful as evidence of the position taken and the argument made. Its limit is that it is advocacy by an interested party in an active political dispute, not a neutral or scholarly account of the swastika's history; this atlas cites it as evidence of the position taken, not as settling the terminology question.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
The Coalition of Hindus of North America's 2022 submission to a Canadian House of Commons committee, the middle tier reflecting that it is a real, publicly filed primary document of an actual legislative debate, weighed against its character as advocacy by an interested party in an active political dispute rather than a neutral or scholarly account. NotesAdvocacy submission, cited as evidence of the position taken rather than as a neutral account. Argues for the term Nazi Hakenkreuz in place of swastika in Canadian hate-symbol legislation.
Citation
AuthorCoalition of Hindus of North America
PublisherHouse of Commons of Canada
Publication Year2022
Source TypePrimary document
Connections
Associated With
This source names Americas directly: "The Coalition of Hindus of North America's 2022 submission to a House of Commons of Canada committee on Bill C-229 argues for the term "Nazi Hakenkreuz" rather than "swastika" in proposed Canadian..."
Source Submission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on Bill C-229Coalition of Hindus of North America
This source names Canada directly: "submission to a House of Commons of Canada committee on Bill C-229 argues for the term "Nazi Hakenkreuz" rather than "swastika" in proposed Canadian hate symbol legislation."
Source Submission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on Bill C-229Coalition of Hindus of North America
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)
This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Religious Symbols, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.