Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Taoism In Taiwan (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wikipedia's article on Taoism in Taiwan, community-edited. Reliable for the standard account of a large influx of Han Chinese settlers from Fujian beginning in the 1660s, who brought Chinese traditional religion including Taoism with them, and for the documented 1949 arrival of Zhang Enpu, the 63rd Celestial Master of Taoism, who fled mainland China with the retreating Nationalist government and brought the religion's own orthodox Zhengyi leadership to the island; not the right source for a single precise year within the 1660s wave, which the article states only as a decade.

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taoism_in_Taiwan
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the 1660s Fujian settlement wave (stated as a decade, not a single year) and the settled 1949 arrival of Zhang Enpu.
Notes
Used for Taoism's arrival in Taiwan and its later strengthening after the 1949 Nationalist retreat.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "Master of Taoism, who fled mainland China with the retreating Nationalist government and brought the religion's own orthodox Zhengyi leadership to the island; not the right source for a single..."

Source Taoism In Taiwan (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Han Chinese, Cultures

This source names Han Chinese directly: "Reliable for the standard account of a large influx of Han Chinese settlers from Fujian beginning in the 1660s, who brought Chinese traditional religion including Taoism with them, and for the..."

Source Taoism In Taiwan (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Taiwan, Countries

This source names Taiwan directly: "Wikipedia's article on Taoism in Taiwan, community-edited."

Source Taoism In Taiwan (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (37 claims)

This source backs 37 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Spread Events, 14 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 6 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds.

Scholarly debate

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.