Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Acts of Thomas: Introduction, Text, and Commentary

The standard critical edition and English translation of the Acts of Thomas, reconstructing a composite Syriac text against the Greek witnesses with a full introduction and verse by verse commentary. The second revised edition updated Klijn's original 1962 edition.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Brill as A. F. J. Klijn's standard critical edition and English translation with full commentary, the second revised edition of his 1962 original, treated at the top tier as that standard critical scholarly edition.
Notes
The standard peer-reviewed critical edition, reconstructing a composite Syriac text against the Greek witnesses with full philological apparatus; reliable as the text, its variants and Klijn's own commentary, not as an argument for any particular theological reading of the work. Use for the Acts of Thomas' structure, dating, original-language question and its Hymn of the Pearl commentary; the Brill critical-edition series counterpart to the Nag Hammadi Studies volumes already cited elsewhere in this atlas.
Citation
Author
A. F. J. Klijn
Publisher
Brill (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 108)
Publication Year
2003
URL
https://brill.com/display/title/8199
Source Type
Critical edition
Connections

Associated With

Thomas, Figures

This source names Thomas directly: "and English translation of the Acts of Thomas, reconstructing a composite Syriac text against the Greek witnesses with a full introduction and verse by verse commentary."

Source The Acts of Thomas: Introduction, Text, and CommentaryA. F. J. Klijn
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)

This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scriptures & Texts, 14 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.