David Shankland's account is built from direct fieldwork among Alevi communities in Turkey, observing and recording the cem ceremony and community life as actually practiced rather than reconstructing Alevi practice from historical documents alone. That firsthand ethnographic method, a real methodological basis distinct from any claim about its publisher, is why this atlas treats it as a strong source for contemporary Alevi practice specifically. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly disagreement with Shankland's specific observations. Use it for how the cem is actually held and for Alevi community life as documented through this fieldwork.
Facts
Citation
AuthorDavid Shankland
PublisherRoutledgeCurzon
Publication Year2003
URLhttps://archive.org/details/alevisinturkeyem0000shan
Source TypeEthnography
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
David Shankland's account built from direct fieldwork among Alevi communities in Turkey, observing and recording the cem ceremony and community life as actually practiced rather than reconstructing Alevi practice from historical documents alone. NotesFieldwork-based account of Alevi community life and of the cem as it is actually held.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Turkey directly: "fieldwork among Alevi communities in Turkey, observing and recording the cem ceremony and community life as actually practiced rather than reconstructing Alevi practice from historical documents..."
Source The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic TraditionDavid Shankland
Claims Backed By This Source (164 claims)
This source backs 164 claims across the atlas. As facts: 66 well-attested. As cited relationships: 61 holds, 4 connected, 1 critiqued Here, 4 held Differently. Plus 28 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Religious Orders, 60 claims: 4 well-attested, 43 holds, 1 connected, 4 held Differently, 8 general references.
- Articles, 16 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 connected, 3 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 4 general references.
- Denominations, 12 claims: 4 well-attested, 6 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 12 claims: 1 well-attested, 6 holds, 5 general references.
- Practices, 12 claims: 11 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Open Questions, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sacred Dances, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.