Sources
The Alphabet of Ben Sira
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Alphabet of Ben Sira is the primary text itself, an anonymous medieval Hebrew work, likely composed sometime between the eighth and tenth centuries, that survives as the earliest source naming Lilith as Adam's first wife who refused subordination and left Eden before Eve was created. Its strength is that it is the actual earliest known textual source for this specific Lilith narrative, giving a real documented origin point for a figure who appears only obliquely in earlier Jewish and Mesopotamian tradition, useful wherever the atlas needs the primary source rather than a secondhand paraphrase of where the story comes from. Its limit is that the work itself is satirical and irreverent in tone, filled with deliberately provocative retellings of biblical figures, so it was never accepted as authoritative scripture or serious theology by the tradition that produced it, and a claim treating its Lilith narrative as representing mainstream historical Jewish belief rather than one medieval author's provocative literary invention overstates the text's own standing.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
A primary medieval Hebrew text of uncertain authorship and no modern publisher of record, but a satirical folk compilation of contested date and standing rather than accepted scripture, hence the middle tier rather than the top given to a primary canonical text. NotesHebrew work of roughly the eighth to tenth century CE and the sole source of the narrative making Lilith Adam's first wife. Widely read as satire or parody; its purpose is disputed.
Citation
AuthorAnonymous
Source Typeprimary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Lilith directly: "survives as the earliest source naming Lilith as Adam's first wife who refused subordination and left Eden before Eve was created."
This source names Mesopotamians directly: "The Alphabet of Ben Sira is the primary text itself, an anonymous medieval Hebrew work, likely composed sometime between the eighth and tenth centuries, that survives as the earliest source naming..."
Claims Backed By This Source (27 claims)
This source backs 27 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Figures, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Planets, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Well-attested
20Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
3Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.