Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Anglo-Saxon Minor Poems

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Elliott Van Kirk Dobbie's edition of The Anglo-Saxon Minor Poems, published by Columbia University Press in 1942 as volume six of the Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records series, is the standard critical edition in which the Old English metrical charms are edited and numbered. Its strength is that the Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records series remains the reference edition cited across Old English scholarship. Its limit is that it is a philological edition presenting and numbering the texts rather than an interpretive study of the charms' religious or magical function, so a claim about what the charms meant to those who used them needs an interpretive source alongside this edition.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Columbia University Press in 1942 as volume six of the Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records series, the standard critical edition still cited across Old English scholarship, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records volume VI, where the metrical charms are edited and numbered. In copyright.
Citation
Author
Elliott Van Kirk Dobbie (editor)
Publisher
Columbia University Press, New York
Publication Year
1942
Source Type
Critical edition
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Anglo-Saxons, Cultures

This source names Anglo-Saxons directly: "Elliott Van Kirk Dobbie's edition of The Anglo-Saxon Minor Poems, published by Columbia University Press in 1942 as volume six of the Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records series, is the standard critical..."

Source The Anglo-Saxon Minor PoemsElliott Van Kirk Dobbie (editor)
Saxons, Cultures

This source names Saxons directly: "Elliott Van Kirk Dobbie's edition of The Anglo-Saxon Minor Poems, published by Columbia University Press in 1942 as volume six of the Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records series, is the standard critical..."

Source The Anglo-Saxon Minor PoemsElliott Van Kirk Dobbie (editor)
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)

This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Incantations, Spells & Curses, 11 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 2 general references.
  • Languages, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.