Cyrus Stearns is a scholar of Tibetan Buddhism, and this State University of New York Press book is his scholarly study of the life and thought of Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, the founder of the Jonang school's distinctive shentong, other-emptiness, teaching. Its strength is close engagement with Dolpopa's own Tibetan writings to reconstruct a controversial doctrinal position that was suppressed for centuries within Tibet, giving readers access to a genuinely marginalized strand of Tibetan Buddhist philosophy in its own terms. Its limit is that it is a focused study of Dolpopa and the Jonang tradition specifically, so a claim about the rival Gelug school's philosophical position, or about Tibetan Buddhism more broadly, needs a source addressing those separate traditions.
Facts
Citation
AuthorCyrus Stearns
PublisherState University of New York Press
Publication Year1999
URLhttps://archive.org/details/buddhafromdolpos0000stea
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Cyrus Stearns's scholarly study of the life and thought of the Jonang master Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen. NotesScholarly study of the life and thought of the Jonang master Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen.
Connections
Associated With
This source names New York directly: "Buddhism, and this State University of New York Press book is his scholarly study of the life and thought of Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, the founder of the Jonang school's distinctive shentong..."
Source The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master Dolpopa Sherab GyaltsenCyrus Stearns
Claims Backed By This Source (56 claims)
This source backs 56 claims across the atlas. As facts: 39 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 4 connected. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 24 claims: 15 well-attested, 4 connected, 5 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 14 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 general references.
- Doctrines, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.