Sources
The Canon Debate
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Canon Debate, edited by Lee Martin McDonald and James A. Sanders, is a substantial scholarly volume collecting essays from many biblical scholars on the historical formation of the Jewish and Christian scriptural canons, presenting genuinely differing scholarly positions on contested questions like when and how canon boundaries were fixed rather than advancing one editorial thesis. Its authority is that of a broad, multi-contributor academic reference reflecting the real range of expert opinion in a field where specific dates and mechanisms for canonization remain actively debated. Because it deliberately includes competing scholarly views rather than resolving them, any single claim drawn from the volume should be attributed to its specific contributing essay rather than treated as the book's own unified position.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Reliability tier 1: a substantial multi contributor academic volume presenting genuinely differing scholarly positions rather than one editorial thesis, any single claim best attributed to its specific contributing essay. NotesEdited academic volume surveying scholarly debates over the formation of the biblical canon.
Citation
AuthorLee Martin McDonald and James A. Sanders (eds.)
PublisherHendrickson Publishers
Publication Year2002
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Articles, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.