Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Christian Interpretation of the Cabala in the Renaissance

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Joseph Leon Blau's The Christian Interpretation of the Cabala in the Renaissance, published by Columbia University Press in 1944, is a scholarly study of how Renaissance Christian scholars adopted and reinterpreted Jewish Kabbalah for their own theological purposes. Its authority rests on standard academic peer review at a major university press and its standing as an early and still cited study of Christian Kabbalah specifically as a distinct intellectual movement. Its limit is age: eight decades of subsequent scholarship on both Jewish Kabbalah and Renaissance intellectual history have refined and in places revised specific points, so a very particular claim about an individual Renaissance figure's Kabbalistic reading is worth checking against more recent specialist literature even as the book's broader framing remains a standard reference point.

Facts
Citation
Author
Joseph Leon Blau
Publisher
Columbia University Press
New York, 1944, per the Cambridge Core (Church History) review of the same edition and the publisher's own digital reissue record.
Publication Year
1944
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a peer reviewed scholarly monograph from a university press, an early and still cited study though refined by eight decades of subsequent scholarship.
Notes
Scholarly study of the Christian interpretation of the Kabbalah during the Renaissance.
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Holds

1

Historical Figures

General References

3

Esoteric Texts

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.