Hugh B. Urban is a scholar of new religious movements, and this Princeton University Press book is his scholarly history of the Church of Scientology, examining it as a new religious movement using the same academic methods applied to any other religious tradition. Its strength is genuinely independent scholarly treatment grounded in documentary and archival research, neither simply repeating the Church's own account of itself nor relying solely on hostile outside sources, a balance that is difficult to strike given how contested the Church's history remains. Its limit is that as an outside academic history it does not have access to all of the Church's internal materials, so a claim resting on specific internal Church teaching or practice not addressed in publicly available sources needs to be checked against what documentation is actually available.
Facts
Citation
AuthorHugh B. Urban
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year2011
URLhttps://archive.org/details/churchofscientol0000urba_a4z1
Source Typebook
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Princeton University Press as Hugh B. Urban's academic history of Scientology, peer reviewed university press scholarship. NotesUrban's scholarly history of the Church of Scientology as a new religious movement.
Claims Backed By This Source (44 claims)
This source backs 44 claims across the atlas. As facts: 33 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- New Religious Movements, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Organizations, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.