Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz is a Rosicrucian allegorical romance first published anonymously at Strasbourg in 1616, and this record states its authorship question honestly: Johann Valentin Andreae's later claim to have written it, made in old age and describing the work as a ludibrium, a jest, is the main direct evidence for the attribution rather than a settled fact established at the time of publication. As a primary text of the early Rosicrucian corpus it is authoritative for its own allegorical content and imagery, checkable directly against the text, not for a resolved account of who wrote it or with what intent. Use it to establish what this specific Rosicrucian romance itself narrates; a claim about the historical Rosicrucian movement's actual membership, aims or later development needs a dedicated scholarly history of Rosicrucianism addressing that question, since this primary text is evidence only for its own content.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
An anonymously published 1616 Rosicrucian allegory later claimed, in old age, by Johann Valentin Andreae, who called it a jest, cited as the tradition's own foundational romance rather than as an outside historical account of the movement.
Notes
Published anonymously; Andreae's later claim to authorship, made in old age and calling the work a ludibrium (a jest), is the main direct evidence for attribution.
Citation
Author
Attributed to Johann Valentin Andreae
Publisher
Lazare Zetzner
First printed by Lazare Zetzner at Strasbourg, 1616, despite its original anonymous publication.
Publication Year
1616
Source Type
Book (primary)
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Secret Societies, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Holds

1

Secret Societies

General References

2

Historical Figures

Secret Societies

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.