The Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China: A Political History of the Tibetan Institution of Reincarnation, Peter Schwieger's 2015 study from Columbia University Press, is a scholarly political history of the Tibetan institution of reincarnation and its relation to the Chinese imperial court. Its strength is that it is a peer vetted academic press monograph tracing the institution's political dimension across centuries. Its limit is that its subject is the institution's political history specifically, not a theological account of reincarnation doctrine itself, which should be sought in dedicated Buddhist studies scholarship.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Peter Schwieger's The Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China, published by Columbia University Press, is a peer vetted academic press monograph tracing the political history of the Tibetan institution of reincarnation, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship. NotesScholarly political history of the Tibetan institution of reincarnation and its relation to the Chinese court, Columbia University Press, 2015.
Citation
AuthorPeter Schwieger
PublisherColumbia University Press
Publication Year2015
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names China directly: "The Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China: A Political History of the Tibetan Institution of Reincarnation, Peter Schwieger's 2015 study from Columbia University Press, is a scholarly political..."
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Religious Offices, 2 claims: 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.