Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Devaraja Cult

Hermann Kulke's The Devaraja Cult, published by Cornell University's Southeast Asia Program in 1978, is a scholarly study of the god-king cult central to Southeast Asian, principally Khmer, sacred kingship. Its authority rests on standard academic publication through a specialist regional studies program and Kulke's standing as a historian of early Southeast Asia. Its limit is age: subsequent decades of epigraphic and archaeological research on Angkor and related sites have refined some specific points a 1978 study could not have incorporated, so a very specific claim about a particular inscription or monument benefits from checking against more recent specialist scholarship, even as the book's broader account of the devaraja concept remains a standard reference.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Hermann Kulke's The Devaraja Cult, published by Cornell University's Southeast Asia Program in 1978, the top tier reflecting standard academic publication through a specialist regional studies program and Kulke's standing as a historian of early Southeast Asia, notwithstanding that subsequent decades of epigraphic and archaeological research have refined some specific points a 1978 study could not incorporate.
Notes
Scholarly study of the devaraja god-king cult in Southeast Asian, principally Khmer, kingship, 1978.
Citation
Author
Hermann Kulke
Publisher
Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University
Data Paper 108, 1978, translated from Kulke's 1974 German original.
Publication Year
1978
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "by Cornell University's Southeast Asia Program in 1978, is a scholarly study of the god-king cult central to Southeast Asian, principally Khmer, sacred kingship."

Source The Devaraja CultHermann Kulke
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.

Well-attested

9

Doctrines

Scholarly debate

2

Doctrines

Holds

3

Doctrines

General References

1

Doctrines

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.