Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The earliest Buddhist shrine: excavating the birthplace of the Buddha, Lumbini (Nepal)

Robin Coningham, Kosh Prasad Acharya and their co-authors are archaeologists, and this peer reviewed article in the journal Antiquity reports their excavation identifying the earliest structural shrine beneath the Maya Devi Temple at Lumbini, the Buddha's traditional birthplace in Nepal. Its strength is that it is peer reviewed field archaeology with stratigraphic and radiocarbon evidence, published in a leading archaeology journal, establishing the earliest known Buddhist shrine at the site. Its limit is that it dates a structure at the traditional birthplace, it does not itself settle the separate historical question of the Buddha's own birth date or the reliability of the site's identification, so a claim resting on those wider questions needs additional sources.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published in Antiquity, a leading peer reviewed archaeology journal, Robin Coningham, Kosh Prasad Acharya and co-authors' peer reviewed field archaeology report with stratigraphic and radiocarbon evidence, peer reviewed university-level scholarship.
Notes
Archaeological excavation report identifying the earliest structural shrine at the Buddha's traditional birthplace, Lumbini, Nepal.
Citation
Author
Robin Coningham; Kosh Prasad Acharya; and others
Publisher
Antiquity
Publication Year
2013
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Connections

Associated With

Nepal, Countries

This source names Nepal directly: "the Buddha's traditional birthplace in Nepal."

Source The earliest Buddhist shrine: excavating the birthplace of the Buddha, Lumbini (Nepal)Robin Coningham; Kosh Prasad Acharya; and others
Claims Backed By This Source (28 claims)

This source backs 28 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Sites, 15 claims: 10 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Figures, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.