Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Ecological Basis for Aztec Sacrifice

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Michael Harner's The Ecological Basis for Aztec Sacrifice is a genuinely controversial anthropological argument, proposing that large-scale Aztec human sacrifice functioned in part as a response to a shortage of animal protein in the Mesoamerican diet, published in a major peer-reviewed anthropology journal. The thesis attracted immediate and sustained criticism from other Mesoamericanists, who argued Harner both overstated the region's protein scarcity, given documented dietary staples like maize and beans, and understated the sacrifice's clearly religious and political functions within Aztec cosmology and imperial control. The materialist protein hypothesis is now a minority position within Aztec studies rather than an accepted explanation, cited today mainly as an example of a provocative but largely rejected functionalist theory, and any use of this source should present it as disputed rather than as an established account of sacrificial motive.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Michael Harner's The Ecological Basis for Aztec Sacrifice, published in the peer reviewed journal American Ethnologist, advanced a materialist thesis that attracted sustained criticism from other Mesoamericanists and is now a minority position, the lower tier reflecting that its central claim did not hold up within its own field despite peer reviewed publication, so it should be cited as a disputed argument rather than an established account.
Notes
The paper that proposed protein scarcity as the driver of Mexica sacrifice and cannibalism. Cited here as the statement of a position that the subsequent literature did not sustain, not as a reliable account of Mexica practice.
Citation
Author
Michael Harner
Publisher
American Ethnologist, volume 4
Publication Year
1977
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Studies, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

2

Cultures

Historical Figures

Popular myth - corrected

1

General References

3

Cultures

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.