Stephen LeDrew's The Evolution of Atheism, The Politics of a Modern Movement is a scholarly study published by Oxford University Press, examining the New Atheism movement of the 2000s as a social and political phenomenon rather than purely a philosophical position. Its authority rests on standard academic peer review at a major university press and LeDrew's background in sociology, which lets the book situate New Atheism's rhetoric and organizing within secular movement history rather than treating it in isolation. Its strength is placing recent secular activism in that longer historical and political context, including the internal critiques the movement has drawn from other secularists. Its limit is that it is one sociological reading of a contested and still recent movement, so its specific characterizations of any one figure or organization are worth checking against that figure's or organization's own stated positions.
Facts
Citation
AuthorStephen LeDrew
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year2015
URLhttps://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-evolution-of-atheism-9780190225179
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Stephen LeDrew's The Evolution of Atheism, published by Oxford University Press, is a peer reviewed scholarly study situating New Atheism within secular movement history, treated at the top tier. NotesOne of the secular critiques of New Atheism named in the entry.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names New Atheism directly: "Oxford University Press, examining the New Atheism movement of the 2000s as a social and political phenomenon rather than purely a philosophical position."
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Denominations, 2 claims: 2 general references.
- Religions, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.