Sources

The Georgians (Lang)

Thames and Hudson

Citation Formats

General Reference

Divinity Atlas. "The Georgians (Lang)." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/the-georgians-lang.

APA Style

Divinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Georgians (Lang). Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/the-georgians-lang

BibTeX

@misc{divinityatlas-the-georgians-lang,
  author = {Divinity Atlas},
  title = {The Georgians (Lang)},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/sources/the-georgians-lang},
  note = {Accessed August 30, 2026}
}

David Marshall Lang's archaeological and historical survey of Georgia from prehistory to the medieval kingdom, Thames and Hudson, 1966, part of the Ancient Peoples and Places series.

Facts

Assessment

Reliability Tier

Reliability tier 1: a Cambridge-trained specialist in Caucasian and Byzantine history writing in the same peer-reviewed archaeological survey series as Gimbutas's volume on the Slavs, covering Georgia from prehistory through the medieval kingdom, including the pre-Christian pantheon headed by Armazi and its Zoroastrian-influenced court cult before Georgia's fourth-century conversion.

Citation

Author

David Marshall Lang

Publisher

Thames and Hudson, Ancient Peoples and Places vol. 51

Publication Year

1966

Source Type

academic monograph

Sources

The Georgians (Lang)

David Marshall Lang, Thames and Hudson, Ancient Peoples and Places vol. 51, 1966Publisher and cataloguing record, Thames and Hudson, Ancient Peoples and Places

Claims Backed By This Source (45 claims)

This source backs 45 claims across the atlas. As facts: 27 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 5 connected. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

Deities, 24 claims: 14 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 4 connected, 2 general references.
Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
Articles, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Pantheons, 2 claims: 1 connected, 1 general references.
Religions, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.