Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (abridged edition)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is the 1922 one-volume abridgment of James Frazer's The Golden Bough, the version of Frazer's comparative study of magic, religion and myth most widely read since publication, condensing his full twelve-volume third edition. As the standard abridged edition it is the correct source for Frazer's own comparative argument and the wide range of myth and ritual he drew together to make it. Its limit is that Frazer's method, treating myths from many unrelated cultures as evidence for a single evolutionary sequence from magic through religion to science, is now regarded by anthropologists as outdated and unsupported, so a claim resting on Frazer's specific interpretation of any one tradition needs to be checked against modern scholarship on that tradition rather than taken as established.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
James Frazer's Macmillan edition, the standard widely read abridgment of his comparative study, treated at the top tier as that standard primary text, notwithstanding that his underlying evolutionary method is now regarded by anthropologists as outdated.
Notes
The one-volume abridgment of Frazer's full twelve-volume third edition (1906-1915), the version most widely read.
Citation
Author
James George Frazer
Publisher
Macmillan
Publication Year
1922
URL
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3623
Source Type
primary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)

This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 23 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Esoteric Texts, 14 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Bodies of Water, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.