Clement Falbo's The Golden Ratio, A Contrary Viewpoint is a peer reviewed article in the College Mathematics Journal, a publication of the Mathematical Association of America, examining popular claims that the golden ratio appears throughout nature and art. Its authority rests on that peer review and on Falbo's direct citation of measured data, including nautilus shells measured at the California Academy of Sciences giving a ratio near 1.33 rather than 1.618, and a later eighty shell Smithsonian study giving about 1.31. Its strength is that it tests a widely repeated popular claim against actual measurement rather than restating the claim on authority. Its limit is scope: it is a single article addressing specific popular claims about the ratio's supposed ubiquity, not a comprehensive survey of every context in which the golden ratio has been proposed to appear, so a claim about a different specific case still needs its own check.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Clement Falbo's The Golden Ratio, A Contrary Viewpoint, a peer reviewed article in the College Mathematics Journal published by the Mathematical Association of America, the top tier reflecting standard academic peer review and Falbo's direct citation of measured data, including nautilus shells measured at the California Academy of Sciences and a later eighty shell Smithsonian study, testing a popular claim against actual measurement rather than restating it on authority, notwithstanding that it addresses specific popular claims about the golden ratio's supposed ubiquity rather than every context the ratio has been proposed to appear in. NotesNautilus shells measured at the California Academy of Sciences give a ratio near 1.33, not 1.618; a later 80-shell Smithsonian study gave about 1.31.
Citation
AuthorClement Falbo
PublisherThe College Mathematics Journal
Publication Year2005
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.2005.11922119
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Americas directly: "Clement Falbo's The Golden Ratio, A Contrary Viewpoint is a peer reviewed article in the College Mathematics Journal, a publication of the Mathematical Association of America, examining popular..."
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Sacred Geometry, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.