Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Hammer of Witches: A Complete Translation of the Malleus Maleficarum

Christopher S. Mackay is a classicist and historian, and this Cambridge University Press volume is his current scholarly translation of the Malleus Maleficarum, the fifteenth century witch-hunting manual, with a scholarly introduction covering its printing history, the papal bull attached to early editions and the University of Cologne's actual limited approbation of the work. Its strength is that Mackay's introduction corrects popular misconceptions about the text's authority, including the frequently repeated but inaccurate claim that it carried full and unanimous Church endorsement. Its limit is that it is a translation and historical introduction, not a broader history of the witch trials themselves, so a claim about the trials' actual scope and toll across Europe needs a source addressing that wider history rather than this text alone.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The current standard scholarly translation of the Malleus Maleficarum, with an introduction covering its printing history and papal approval.
Notes
The current scholarly translation, with an introduction covering the printing history, the papal bull and the Cologne approbation.
Citation
Author
Christopher S. Mackay
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
2009
Source Type
Critical translation with scholarly introduction
Connections

Associated With

Europe, Continents

This source names Europe directly: "trials' actual scope and toll across Europe needs a source addressing that wider history rather than this text alone."

Source The Hammer of Witches: A Complete Translation of the Malleus MaleficarumChristopher S. Mackay
Claims Backed By This Source (42 claims)

This source backs 42 claims across the atlas. As facts: 33 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Esoteric Texts, 14 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Religious Legal Instruments, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.