Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China

The Huainanzi, A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China, translated and edited by John S. Major, Sarah A. Queen, Andrew Seth Meyer and Harold D. Roth, published by Columbia University Press in 2010, is the standard modern scholarly critical translation of this Han-dynasty text on cosmology, statecraft and self-cultivation. Its authority rests on Columbia University Press's peer review and the four scholars' combined specialist standing in early Chinese thought. It is the primary text in careful, annotated translation, with the translators' own introductions and notes situating disputed passages within current scholarly debate rather than resolving them by assertion.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Huainanzi, A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China, translated and edited by John S. Major, Sarah A. Queen, Andrew Seth Meyer and Harold D. Roth, published by Columbia University Press in 2010, the top tier reflecting Columbia's peer review and the four scholars' combined specialist standing, with the translators' own notes situating disputed passages within current scholarly debate rather than resolving them by assertion.
Notes
Scholarly translation and study of the Huainanzi, a Han-dynasty text on early Chinese government and cosmology, Columbia University Press, 2010.
Citation
Author
John S. Major, Sarah A. Queen, Andrew Seth Meyer and Harold D. Roth (trans. and eds.)
Publisher
Columbia University Press
Publication Year
2010
Source Type
critical translation
Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "Practice of Government in Early Han China, translated and edited by John S."

Source The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han ChinaJohn S. Major, Sarah A. Queen, Andrew Seth Meyer and Harold D. Roth (trans. and eds.)
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Other Writings, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.