Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Image of Edessa

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Mark Guscin is a scholar of Byzantine studies, and this Brill book is his academic study of the Byzantine textual sources on the Mandylion, the Image of Edessa, tracing its translation to Constantinople in 944 and its disappearance after the city's sack in 1204. Its strength is that it works directly from the Byzantine documentary sources rather than from later legend, published by a specialist academic press. Its limit is that it addresses the documented Byzantine history of the object's movements, not the separate and unresolved question of any relationship between the Mandylion and the Shroud of Turin, so a claim linking the two needs a source that engages that specific comparison.

Facts
Citation
Author
Mark Guscin
Publisher
Brill
Publication Year
2009
URL
https://brill.com/display/title/16878
Source Type
book
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Brill as Mark Guscin's scholarly study of the Image of Edessa tradition, peer reviewed university-level scholarship.
Notes
Academic study (Brill) of the Byzantine sources on the Mandylion, its translation to Constantinople (944) and disappearance (1204).
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Constantinople, Cities

This source names Constantinople directly: "of Edessa, tracing its translation to Constantinople in 944 and its disappearance after the city's sack in 1204."

Source The Image of EdessaMark Guscin
Edessa, Cities

This source names Edessa directly: "sources on the Mandylion, the Image of Edessa, tracing its translation to Constantinople in 944 and its disappearance after the city's sack in 1204."

Source The Image of EdessaMark Guscin
Turin, Cities

This source names Turin directly: "the Mandylion and the Shroud of Turin, so a claim linking the two needs a source that engages that specific comparison."

Source The Image of EdessaMark Guscin
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)

This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Figures, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Holds

9

Artifacts & Relics

General References

3

Artifacts & Relics

Cities

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.