James Barr's The Image of God in the Book of Genesis is a scholarly philological study examining what the Hebrew phrase for humanity being made in God's image actually meant in its ancient Near Eastern context, written by one of the most respected biblical Hebrew scholars of his generation. Its authority rests on close linguistic and comparative textual analysis rather than theological argument for its own sake, and Barr's conclusions have been influential in shifting scholarly discussion of the phrase's original sense away from later doctrinal readings developed centuries after Genesis was written. As a technical philological study its scope is specifically the phrase's ancient meaning, not a survey of how the image of God concept was subsequently developed across the long history of Jewish and Christian theology, which is a separate and much larger body of literature.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
James Barr's The Image of God in the Book of Genesis, published in the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, is a scholarly philological study by one of the most respected biblical Hebrew scholars of his generation, treated at the top tier. NotesPhilological study of tselem and demut across the Hebrew Bible, foundational to the modern scholarly debate over what the divine image terminology marks.
Citation
AuthorJames Barr
PublisherBulletin of the John Rylands Library, volume 51, pages 11 to 26
Publication Year1968
Source TypeJournal article
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Doctrines, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.